ENTRY O1511 20191009 O072O151100000001 SUBENT O1511001 20191009 O072O151100100001 BIB 8 23 O151100100002 TITLE Production of Ce-139 by proton-induced reactions on O151100100003 Pr-141 and La-nat O151100100004 AUTHOR (C.Vermeulen, G.F.Steyn, F.M.Nortier,F.Szelecsenyi, O151100100005 Z.Kovacs,S.M.Qaim) O151100100006 INSTITUTE (3SAFITH,1USALAS,3HUNDEB,2GERJUL) O151100100007 REFERENCE (J,NIM/B,255,331,2007) O151100100008 REL-REF (M,D0357001,G.F.Steyn+,J,NIM/B,252,149,2006) More the O151100100009 experimental details. O151100100010 * The cross sections of the observed activation O151100100011 products were calculated from their measured O151100100012 gamma-ray emissions using disintegration data O151100100013 from the catalogue of Firestone et al., Table of O151100100014 radioactive isotopes, version 2.1, January 2004. O151100100015 Available from http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/toi/ O151100100016 DETECTOR (HPGE) Two accurately calibrated HPGE detector with a O151100100017 relative efficiency of 13% (iThemba LABS) and O151100100018 20% (Julich). O151100100019 ADD-RES (COMP) The geometry-dependent Hybrid(GDH) model. O151100100020 HISTORY (20070503C) SB O151100100021 (20070504U) Last checking has been done. O151100100022 (20191009A) SD: BIB updated. REACTION code corrected O151100100023 in Subents 007-009. STATUS moved to Subents 002-009. O151100100024 ERR-ANALYS corrected in Subents 002-009. O151100100025 ENDBIB 23 0 O151100100026 NOCOMMON 0 0 O151100100027 ENDSUBENT 26 0 O151100199999 SUBENT O1511002 20191009 O072O151100200001 BIB 10 48 O151100200002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)58-CE-132,CUM,SIG) O151100200003 FACILITY (CYCLO,3SAFITH) The separated-sector cyclotron facilityO151100200004 of iThemba LABS in Faure, South Africa. O151100200005 SAMPLE Several composite foil stacks were irradiated at O151100200006 primary proton-beam energies of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 O151100200007 and 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted of high-purity O151100200008 Pr-foils of 100 mum thickness (99.9%), high-purity O151100200009 Al- monitor foils of 250 mum thickness (99.999%) and O151100200010 groups of 125 mum thick Cu-degrader foils (99.9%) as O151100200011 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across O151100200012 the entire energy region of interest. O151100200013 METHOD (ACTIV) O151100200014 (BCINT) The beams currents were nominally either 50 or O151100200015 100-nA. The irradiation times varied between 1 and O151100200016 1.5-Hr O151100200017 (STTA,GSPEC) O151100200018 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-22,,SIG) The Al-monitor foils O151100200019 served as a consistency check. O151100200020 DECAY-DATA (58-CE-132,3.51HR,DG,182.11,0.77) O151100200021 CORRECTION *By authors*.Corrections were made for decay losses O151100200022 during and after bombardment, as well as during O151100200023 counting. For all the stacks, the beam flux measured byO151100200024 direct integration did not differ by more than 5% with O151100200025 the values determined from the monitor foils sets. O151100200026 Corrections for beam current losses due to nonelastic O151100200027 nuclear interactions were made. O151100200028 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-SYS) The systematic uncertainty was estimated to O151100200029 be about 7%, including- O151100200030 (ERR-1).The uncertainty in beam current integration O151100200031 is 3%. O151100200032 (ERR-2).The uncertainty in detector efficiency is 5%. O151100200033 (ERR-3).The uncertainty in counting geometry is 1%. O151100200034 (ERR-4).The uncertainty in decay corrections is 2%. O151100200035 (ERR-5).The uncertainty in foil thickness is 3%. O151100200036 in the measured cross O151100200037 (ERR-T) The total uncertainties includes: O151100200038 * the uncertainty due to counting statistics and O151100200039 photo-peak integration O151100200040 (ERR-6) the uncertainty associated with the beam-loss O151100200041 correction and ERR-SYS. O151100200042 (EN-ERR) The uncertainty in energy of each measured O151100200043 data point was estimated from the uncertainty in O151100200044 incident beam energy, foil thickness and depth of O151100200045 penetration in the stack. O151100200046 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl. 2 from Nucl.Instr.Meth.,B255(2007)331 O151100200047 HISTORY (20191009A) SD: ERR-ANALYS updated. ERR-T -> ERR-6; O151100200048 DATA-ERR -> ERR-T. STATUS added. Free text from O151100200049 DECAY-DATA moved to REL-REF in Subent 001. O151100200050 ENDBIB 48 0 O151100200051 COMMON 7 6 O151100200052 ERR-6 ERR-SYS ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-4 O151100200053 ERR-5 O151100200054 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT O151100200055 PER-CENT O151100200056 1.6 7. 3. 5. 1. 2.O151100200057 3. O151100200058 ENDCOMMON 6 0 O151100200059 DATA 4 8 O151100200060 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T O151100200061 MEV MEV MB MB O151100200062 71.6 1.6 0.64 0.16 O151100200063 75.4 1.5 3.16 0.27 O151100200064 78.7 1.3 7.89 0.58 O151100200065 82.4 1.2 15.1 1.0 O151100200066 86.2 1.1 22.4 1.6 O151100200067 89.6 0.9 25.5 1.8 O151100200068 93.2 0.8 27.1 1.9 O151100200069 96.5 0.7 25.7 1.8 O151100200070 ENDDATA 10 0 O151100200071 ENDSUBENT 70 0 O151100299999 SUBENT O1511003 20191009 O072O151100300001 BIB 11 51 O151100300002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)58-CE-133-M,,SIG) O151100300003 COMMENT *By authors*.The shorter-lived ground state with O151100300004 meaningful statistics could not extracted. O151100300005 FACILITY (CYCLO,3SAFITH) The separated-sector cyclotron facilityO151100300006 of iThemba LABS in Faure, South Africa. O151100300007 SAMPLE Several composite foil stacks were irradiated at O151100300008 primary proton-beam energies of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 O151100300009 and 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted of high-purity O151100300010 Pr-foils of 100 mum thickness (99.9%), high-purity O151100300011 Al- monitor foils of 250 mum thickness (99.999%) and O151100300012 groups of 125 mum thick Cu-degrader foils (99.9%) as O151100300013 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across O151100300014 the entire energy region of interest. O151100300015 METHOD (ACTIV) O151100300016 (BCINT) The beams currents were nominally either 50 or O151100300017 100-nA. The irradiation times varied between 1 and O151100300018 1.5-Hr O151100300019 (STTA,GSPEC) O151100300020 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-22,,SIG) The Al-monitor foils O151100300021 served as a consistency check. O151100300022 DECAY-DATA (58-CE-133-M,4.9HR,DG,130.80,0.179) O151100300023 CORRECTION *By authors*.Corrections were made for decay losses O151100300024 during and after bombardment, as well as during O151100300025 counting. For all the stacks, the beam flux measured byO151100300026 direct integration did not differ by more than 5% with O151100300027 the values determined from the monitor foils sets. O151100300028 Corrections for beam current losses due to nonelastic O151100300029 nuclear interactions were made. O151100300030 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-SYS) The systematic uncertainty was estimated to O151100300031 be about 7%, including- O151100300032 (ERR-1).The uncertainty in beam current integration O151100300033 is 3%. O151100300034 (ERR-2).The uncertainty in detector efficiency is 5%. O151100300035 (ERR-3).The uncertainty in counting geometry is 1%. O151100300036 (ERR-4).The uncertainty in decay corrections is 2%. O151100300037 (ERR-5).The uncertainty in foil thickness is 3%. O151100300038 in the measured cross O151100300039 (ERR-T) The total uncertainties includes: O151100300040 * the uncertainty due to counting statistics and O151100300041 photo-peak integration O151100300042 (ERR-6) the uncertainty associated with the beam-loss O151100300043 correction and ERR-SYS. O151100300044 (EN-ERR) The uncertainty in energy of each measured O151100300045 data point was estimated from the uncertainty in O151100300046 incident beam energy, foil thickness and depth of O151100300047 penetration in the stack. O151100300048 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl. 2 from Nucl.Instr.Meth.,B255(2007)331 O151100300049 HISTORY (20191008A) SD: SF5=IND deleted from REACTION code. O151100300050 ERR-ANALYS updated. ERR-T -> ERR-6; DATA-ERR -> ERR-T. O151100300051 STATUS added. Free text from DECAY-DATA moved to O151100300052 REL-REF in Subent 001. O151100300053 ENDBIB 51 0 O151100300054 COMMON 7 6 O151100300055 ERR-6 ERR-SYS ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-4 O151100300056 ERR-5 O151100300057 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT O151100300058 PER-CENT O151100300059 1.6 7. 3. 5. 1. 2.O151100300060 3. O151100300061 ENDCOMMON 6 0 O151100300062 DATA 4 11 O151100300063 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T O151100300064 MEV MEV MB MB O151100300065 63.7 0.6 2.18 0.41 O151100300066 64.0 1.9 4.21 0.53 O151100300067 67.8 1.7 8.71 0.76 O151100300068 71.6 1.6 16.6 1.3 O151100300069 75.4 1.5 23.0 1.7 O151100300070 78.7 1.3 22.5 1.7 O151100300071 82.4 1.2 21.7 1.8 O151100300072 86.2 1.1 17.2 1.4 O151100300073 89.6 0.9 14.9 1.2 O151100300074 93.2 0.8 13.2 1.1 O151100300075 96.5 0.7 12.4 1. O151100300076 ENDDATA 13 0 O151100300077 ENDSUBENT 76 0 O151100399999 SUBENT O1511004 20191009 O072O151100400001 BIB 10 48 O151100400002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)58-CE-135,CUM,SIG) O151100400003 FACILITY (CYCLO,3SAFITH) The separated-sector cyclotron facilityO151100400004 of iThemba LABS in Faure, South Africa. O151100400005 SAMPLE Several composite foil stacks were irradiated at O151100400006 primary proton-beam energies of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 O151100400007 and 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted of high-purity O151100400008 Pr-foils of 100 mum thickness (99.9%), high-purity O151100400009 Al- monitor foils of 250 mum thickness (99.999%) and O151100400010 groups of 125 mum thick Cu-degrader foils (99.9%) as O151100400011 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across O151100400012 the entire energy region of interest. O151100400013 METHOD (ACTIV) O151100400014 (BCINT) The beams currents were nominally either 50 or O151100400015 100-nA. The irradiation times varied between 1 and O151100400016 1.5-hr O151100400017 (STTA,GSPEC) O151100400018 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-22,,SIG) The Al-monitor foils O151100400019 served as a consistency check. O151100400020 DECAY-DATA (58-CE-135-G,17.7HR,DG,265.56,0.418) O151100400021 CORRECTION *By authors*.Corrections were made for decay losses O151100400022 during and after bombardment, as well as during O151100400023 counting. For all the stacks, the beam flux measured byO151100400024 direct integration did not differ by more than 5% with O151100400025 the values determined from the monitor foils sets. O151100400026 Corrections for beam current losses due to nonelastic O151100400027 nuclear interactions were made. O151100400028 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-SYS) The systematic uncertainty was estimated to O151100400029 be about 7%, including- O151100400030 (ERR-1).The uncertainty in beam current integration O151100400031 is 3%. O151100400032 (ERR-2).The uncertainty in detector efficiency is 5%. O151100400033 (ERR-3).The uncertainty in counting geometry is 1%. O151100400034 (ERR-4).The uncertainty in decay corrections is 2%. O151100400035 (ERR-5).The uncertainty in foil thickness is 3%. O151100400036 in the measured cross O151100400037 (ERR-T) The total uncertainties includes: O151100400038 * the uncertainty due to counting statistics and O151100400039 photo-peak integration O151100400040 (ERR-6) the uncertainty associated with the beam-loss O151100400041 correction and ERR-SYS. O151100400042 (EN-ERR) The uncertainty in energy of each measured O151100400043 data point was estimated from the uncertainty in O151100400044 incident beam energy, foil thickness and depth of O151100400045 penetration in the stack. O151100400046 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl. 2 from Nucl.Instr.Meth.,B255(2007)331 O151100400047 HISTORY (20191008A) SD: ERR-ANALYS updated. ERR-T -> ERR-6; O151100400048 DATA-ERR -> ERR-T. STATUS added. Free text from O151100400049 DECAY-DATA moved to REL-REF in Subent 001. O151100400050 ENDBIB 48 0 O151100400051 COMMON 7 6 O151100400052 ERR-6 ERR-SYS ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-4 O151100400053 ERR-5 O151100400054 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT O151100400055 PER-CENT O151100400056 1.6 7. 3. 5. 1. 2.O151100400057 3. O151100400058 ENDCOMMON 6 0 O151100400059 DATA 4 23 O151100400060 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T O151100400061 MEV MEV MB MB O151100400062 37.2 0.5 0.82 0.24 O151100400063 40.5 1.4 5.26 0.46 O151100400064 44.1 1.3 15.5 1.1 O151100400065 47.0 1.2 23.2 1.7 O151100400066 50.3 1.1 28.5 2.0 O151100400067 53.0 1.0 27.9 2.0 O151100400068 53.2 2.5 27.9 2.0 O151100400069 56.1 1.0 23.3 1.7 O151100400070 56.8 2.3 22.8 1.7 O151100400071 58.5 0.9 20.2 1.5 O151100400072 60.4 2.1 17.9 1.3 O151100400073 61.4 0.7 16.7 1.2 O151100400074 63.7 0.6 14.5 1.1 O151100400075 64.0 1.9 15.1 1.1 O151100400076 67.8 1.7 15.8 1.2 O151100400077 71.6 1.6 30.9 2.2 O151100400078 75.4 1.5 63.4 4.5 O151100400079 78.7 1.3 110.3 7.8 O151100400080 82.4 1.2 157.3 11.1 O151100400081 86.2 1.1 188.2 13.2 O151100400082 89.6 0.9 198.0 13.9 O151100400083 93.2 0.8 199.6 14.0 O151100400084 96.5 0.7 187.5 13.1 O151100400085 ENDDATA 25 0 O151100400086 ENDSUBENT 85 0 O151100499999 SUBENT O1511005 20191009 O072O151100500001 BIB 11 50 O151100500002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)58-CE-137-M,,SIG) O151100500003 FACILITY (CYCLO,3SAFITH) The separated-sector cyclotron facilityO151100500004 of iThemba LABS in Faure, South Africa. O151100500005 COMMENT *By authors*.Since Ce-137-m has no precursors, O151100500006 excitation function is for its direct production only. O151100500007 SAMPLE Several composite foil stacks were irradiated at O151100500008 primary proton-beam energies of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 O151100500009 and 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted of high-purity O151100500010 Pr-foils of 100 mum thickness (99.9%), high-purity O151100500011 Al- monitor foils of 250 mum thickness (99.999%) and O151100500012 groups of 125 mum thick Cu-degrader foils (99.9%) as O151100500013 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across O151100500014 the entire energy region of interest. O151100500015 METHOD (ACTIV) O151100500016 (BCINT) The beams currents were nominally either 50 or O151100500017 100-nA. The irradiation times varied between 1 and O151100500018 1.5-Hr O151100500019 (STTA,GSPEC) O151100500020 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-22,,SIG) The Al-monitor foils O151100500021 served as a consistency check. O151100500022 DECAY-DATA (58-CE-137-M,34.4HR,DG,254.29,0.11) It 99.22% O151100500023 CORRECTION *By authors*.Corrections were made for decay losses O151100500024 during and after bombardment, as well as during O151100500025 counting. For all the stacks, the beam flux measured byO151100500026 direct integration did not differ by more than 5% with O151100500027 the values determined from the monitor foils sets. O151100500028 Corrections for beam current losses due to nonelastic O151100500029 nuclear interactions were made. O151100500030 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-SYS) The systematic uncertainty was estimated to O151100500031 be about 7%, including- O151100500032 (ERR-1).The uncertainty in beam current integration O151100500033 is 3%. O151100500034 (ERR-2).The uncertainty in detector efficiency is 5%. O151100500035 (ERR-3).The uncertainty in counting geometry is 1%. O151100500036 (ERR-4).The uncertainty in decay corrections is 2%. O151100500037 (ERR-5).The uncertainty in foil thickness is 3%. O151100500038 in the measured cross O151100500039 (ERR-T) The total uncertainties includes: O151100500040 * the uncertainty due to counting statistics and O151100500041 photo-peak integration O151100500042 (ERR-6) the uncertainty associated with the beam-loss O151100500043 correction and ERR-SYS. O151100500044 (EN-ERR) The uncertainty in energy of each measured O151100500045 data point was estimated from the uncertainty in O151100500046 incident beam energy, foil thickness and depth of O151100500047 penetration in the stack. O151100500048 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl. 2 from Nucl.Instr.Meth.,B255(2007)331 O151100500049 HISTORY (20191008A) SD: ERR-ANALYS updated. ERR-T -> ERR-6; O151100500050 DATA-ERR -> ERR-T. STATUS added. Free text from O151100500051 DECAY-DATA moved to REL-REF in Subent 001. O151100500052 ENDBIB 50 0 O151100500053 COMMON 7 6 O151100500054 ERR-6 ERR-SYS ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-4 O151100500055 ERR-5 O151100500056 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT O151100500057 PER-CENT O151100500058 1.6 7. 3. 5. 1. 2.O151100500059 3. O151100500060 ENDCOMMON 6 0 O151100500061 DATA 4 30 O151100500062 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T O151100500063 MEV MEV MB MB O151100500064 26.2 0.9 5.31 1.19 O151100500065 28.5 0.9 7.08 1.16 O151100500066 30.5 0.8 7.91 0.92 O151100500067 31.9 0.7 6.72 0.87 O151100500068 33.8 0.7 5.34 0.74 O151100500069 34.3 0.6 6.15 0.75 O151100500070 37.1 1.6 4.37 0.63 O151100500071 37.2 0.5 4.78 0.60 O151100500072 40.5 1.4 4.06 0.59 O151100500073 44.1 1.3 3.29 0.51 O151100500074 47.0 1.2 3.63 0.57 O151100500075 50.3 1.1 3.43 0.55 O151100500076 53.0 1.0 3.40 0.55 O151100500077 53.2 2.5 3.51 0.54 O151100500078 56.1 1.0 4.34 0.58 O151100500079 56.8 2.3 4.87 0.63 O151100500080 58.5 0.9 5.29 0.64 O151100500081 60.4 2.1 6.25 0.66 O151100500082 61.4 0.7 6.94 0.71 O151100500083 63.7 0.6 7.51 0.74 O151100500084 64.0 1.9 7.38 0.73 O151100500085 67.8 1.7 9.78 0.86 O151100500086 71.6 1.6 11.1 0.9 O151100500087 75.4 1.5 11.0 0.9 O151100500088 78.7 1.3 12.7 1.1 O151100500089 82.4 1.2 13.3 1.1 O151100500090 86.2 1.1 14.0 1.2 O151100500091 89.6 0.9 14.1 1.2 O151100500092 93.2 0.8 15.2 1.3 O151100500093 96.5 0.7 14.8 1.3 O151100500094 ENDDATA 32 0 O151100500095 ENDSUBENT 94 0 O151100599999 SUBENT O1511006 20191009 O072O151100600001 BIB 11 51 O151100600002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)58-CE-139,CUM,SIG) O151100600003 COMMENT *By authors*The data for the cumulative production of O151100600004 Ce-139 are reported. The directly produced component isO151100600005 almost negligible. O151100600006 FACILITY (CYCLO,3SAFITH) The separated-sector cyclotron facilityO151100600007 of iThemba LABS in Faure, South Africa. O151100600008 SAMPLE Several composite foil stacks were irradiated at O151100600009 primary proton-beam energies of 97.8+-0.5, 65.5+-0.4 O151100600010 and 39.6+-0.3 MeV. The stacks consisted of high-purity O151100600011 Pr-foils of 100 mum thickness (99.9%), high-purity O151100600012 Al- monitor foils of 250 mum thickness (99.999%) and O151100600013 groups of 125 mum thick Cu-degrader foils (99.9%) as O151100600014 required to obtain well spaced proton energies across O151100600015 the entire energy region of interest. O151100600016 METHOD (ACTIV) O151100600017 (BCINT) The beams currents were nominally either 50 or O151100600018 100-nA. The irradiation times varied between 1 and O151100600019 1.5-Hr O151100600020 (STTA,GSPEC) O151100600021 MONITOR (13-AL-27(P,X)11-NA-22,,SIG) The Al-monitor foils O151100600022 served as a consistency check. O151100600023 DECAY-DATA (58-CE-139-G,137.64D,DG,165.86,0.8) O151100600024 CORRECTION *By authors*.Corrections were made for decay losses O151100600025 during and after bombardment, as well as during O151100600026 counting. For all the stacks, the beam flux measured byO151100600027 direct integration did not differ by more than 5% with O151100600028 the values determined from the monitor foils sets. O151100600029 Corrections for beam current losses due to nonelastic O151100600030 nuclear interactions were made. O151100600031 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-SYS) The systematic uncertainty was estimated to O151100600032 be about 7%, including- O151100600033 (ERR-1).The uncertainty in beam current integration O151100600034 is 3%. O151100600035 (ERR-2).The uncertainty in detector efficiency is 5%. O151100600036 (ERR-3).The uncertainty in counting geometry is 1%. O151100600037 (ERR-4).The uncertainty in decay corrections is 2%. O151100600038 (ERR-5).The uncertainty in foil thickness is 3%. O151100600039 in the measured cross O151100600040 (ERR-T) The total uncertainties includes: O151100600041 * the uncertainty due to counting statistics and O151100600042 photo-peak integration O151100600043 (ERR-6) the uncertainty associated with the beam-loss O151100600044 correction and ERR-SYS. O151100600045 (EN-ERR) The uncertainty in energy of each measured O151100600046 data point was estimated from the uncertainty in O151100600047 incident beam energy, foil thickness and depth of O151100600048 penetration in the stack. O151100600049 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl. 2 from Nucl.Instr.Meth.,B255(2007)331 O151100600050 HISTORY (20191009A) SD: ERR-ANALYS updated. ERR-T -> ERR-6; O151100600051 DATA-ERR -> ERR-T. STATUS added. Free text from O151100600052 DECAY-DATA moved to REL-REF in Subent 001. O151100600053 ENDBIB 51 0 O151100600054 COMMON 7 6 O151100600055 ERR-6 ERR-SYS ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-4 O151100600056 ERR-5 O151100600057 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT O151100600058 PER-CENT O151100600059 1.6 7. 3. 5. 1. 2.O151100600060 3. O151100600061 ENDCOMMON 6 0 O151100600062 DATA 4 32 O151100600063 EN EN-ERR DATA ERR-T O151100600064 MEV MEV MB MB O151100600065 20.9 1.3 4.61 1.39 O151100600066 23.5 1.1 78.8 7.0 O151100600067 26.2 0.9 486.5 34.3 O151100600068 28.5 0.9 769.7 54.1 O151100600069 30.5 0.8 976.4 69.1 O151100600070 31.9 0.7 983.5 69.0 O151100600071 33.8 0.7 991.8 69.6 O151100600072 34.3 0.6 966.5 68.3 O151100600073 37.1 1.6 818.0 57.4 O151100600074 37.2 0.5 764.8 54.0 O151100600075 40.5 1.4 533.4 37.7 O151100600076 44.1 1.3 391.8 27.7 O151100600077 47.0 1.2 328.9 23.3 O151100600078 50.3 1.1 299.4 21.2 O151100600079 53.0 1.0 286.6 20.3 O151100600080 53.2 2.5 295.5 21.4 O151100600081 56.1 1.0 268.3 19.0 O151100600082 56.8 2.3 269.4 19.5 O151100600083 58.5 0.9 258.8 18.3 O151100600084 60.4 2.1 263.0 18.9 O151100600085 61.4 0.7 250.6 17.8 O151100600086 63.7 0.6 237.1 16.8 O151100600087 64.0 1.9 248.7 17.9 O151100600088 67.8 1.7 237.3 17.0 O151100600089 71.6 1.6 231.6 16.6 O151100600090 75.4 1.5 215.8 15.5 O151100600091 78.7 1.3 212.1 15.2 O151100600092 82.4 1.2 203.1 14.5 O151100600093 86.2 1.1 191.9 13.7 O151100600094 89.6 0.9 188.5 13.5 O151100600095 93.2 0.8 178.0 12.8 O151100600096 96.5 0.7 168.2 12.1 O151100600097 ENDDATA 34 0 O151100600098 ENDSUBENT 97 0 O151100699999 SUBENT O1511007 20191009 O072O151100700001 BIB 4 7 O151100700002 REACTION (59-PR-141(P,X)58-CE-139,,TTY,,PHY,DERIV) O151100700003 ANALYSIS (INTEF) Thick-target production rate. Values calculatedO151100700004 from excitation function. O151100700005 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl. 3 from Nucl.Instr.Meth.,B255(2007)331 O151100700006 (DEP,O1511006) Cr.sect. O151100700007 HISTORY (20191009A) SD: SF8=DT -> PHY in REACTION code. O151100700008 ANALYSIS added. O151100700009 ENDBIB 7 0 O151100700010 NOCOMMON 0 0 O151100700011 DATA 2 16 O151100700012 EN DATA O151100700013 MEV MUCI/MUAHR O151100700014 25. 4.37 O151100700015 30. 51.5 O151100700016 35. 131.8 O151100700017 40. 200.2 O151100700018 45. 244.5 O151100700019 50. 279.4 O151100700020 55. 312.9 O151100700021 60. 345.4 O151100700022 65. 377.6 O151100700023 70. 410.2 O151100700024 75. 442.7 O151100700025 80. 475.1 O151100700026 85. 506.9 O151100700027 90. 538.4 O151100700028 95. 569.4 O151100700029 100. 599.8 O151100700030 ENDDATA 18 0 O151100700031 ENDSUBENT 30 0 O151100799999 SUBENT O1511008 20191009 O072O151100800001 BIB 8 29 O151100800002 REACTION (57-LA-0(P,X)58-CE-139,,TTY,,PHY) O151100800003 Activated La-oxide targets. O151100800004 FACILITY (CYCLO,2GERJUL) The CV-cyclotron facility from Juelich.O151100800005 SAMPLE A brass target holder contained an aluminium degrader, O151100800006 a Ti-monitor foil and a La(2)O(3) target for each O151100800007 measurement. The target were thick enough to stop the O151100800008 beam. O151100800009 The La(2)O(3) disks were pressed from high-purity O151100800010 powder, 99.98% and had a nominal thickness of 1.2-g/cm2O151100800011 The monitor foils were high purity Ti, 99.99% with O151100800012 a thickness of 13.2-mum. O151100800013 METHOD (TTM) O151100800014 (BCINT) An average beam current was 50-nA. O151100800015 Each bombardment lasted approximately 30-min. O151100800016 MONITOR (22-TI-0(P,X)23-V-48,,SIG) O151100800017 ERR-ANALYS (ERR-T) Total uncertainty O151100800018 (ERR-SYS) The systematic uncertainty was estimated to O151100800019 be about 10%, including- O151100800020 (ERR-1).The uncertainty in detector efficiency is 5%. O151100800021 (ERR-2).The uncertainty in counting geometry is 1%. O151100800022 (ERR-3).The uncertainty in decay corrections is 2%. O151100800023 (ERR-4).The uncertainty in monitor foil thickness is 3%O151100800024 the uncertainty in energy of each measured data point O151100800025 was estimated from the uncertainty in incident beam O151100800026 energy, foil thickness and depth of penetration in the O151100800027 stack. O151100800028 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl. 4 from Nucl.Instr.Meth.,B255(2007)331 O151100800029 HISTORY (20191009A) SD: SF8=DT -> PHY in REACTION code. O151100800030 ERR-ANALYS updated. DATA-ERR -> ERR-T. STATUS added. O151100800031 ENDBIB 29 0 O151100800032 COMMON 5 3 O151100800033 ERR-SYS ERR-1 ERR-2 ERR-3 ERR-4 O151100800034 PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT PER-CENT O151100800035 10. 5. 1. 2. 3. O151100800036 ENDCOMMON 3 0 O151100800037 DATA 3 15 O151100800038 EN DATA ERR-T O151100800039 MEV MUCI/MUAHR MUCI/MUAHR O151100800040 1.8 3.8E-03 3.8E-04 O151100800041 3.4 4.3E-03 4.3E-04 O151100800042 5.2 9.3E-03 9.3E-04 O151100800043 6.4 2.4E-01 2.4E-02 O151100800044 7.7 0.41 0.041 O151100800045 8.8 2.03 0.2 O151100800046 10.1 3.4 0.34 O151100800047 11.2 6.14 0.61 O151100800048 12.4 7.02 0.7 O151100800049 13.4 8.64 0.86 O151100800050 14.5 9.46 0.95 O151100800051 15.6 10.2 1.0 O151100800052 16.7 10.5 1.1 O151100800053 17.7 11.7 1.2 O151100800054 18.8 11.8 1.2 O151100800055 ENDDATA 17 0 O151100800056 ENDSUBENT 55 0 O151100899999 SUBENT O1511009 20191009 O072O151100900001 BIB 4 11 O151100900002 REACTION 1(57-LA-0(P,X)58-CE-139,,SIG,,,DERIV) O151100900003 2(57-LA-0(P,X)58-CE-139,,TTY,,PHY,DERIV) O151100900004 ANALYSIS (INTEF) Cross sections and experimental thick-target O151100900005 production rates for 139Ce formed in natLa + p were O151100900006 converted for the case of a pure metal La target. O151100900007 STATUS (TABLE) Table 5 of Nucl.Instrum.Meth.B255(2007)331 O151100900008 (DEP,O1511008) Cr.sect. for La-oxide target O151100900009 HISTORY (20191009A) SD: SF4=Ce-138 -> Ce-139 in REACTION O151100900010 code (1). SF8=DT -> PHY in REACTION code (2). O151100900011 FACILITY, SAMPLE deleted deleted (data were deduced). O151100900012 ANALYSIS, STATUS added. O151100900013 ENDBIB 11 0 O151100900014 NOCOMMON 0 0 O151100900015 DATA 3 19 O151100900016 EN DATA 1DATA 2 O151100900017 MEV MB MUCI/MUAHR O151100900018 2. 1.89 O151100900019 3. 3.95 O151100900020 4. 8.77 3.2E-02 O151100900021 5. 20.0 8.8E-02 O151100900022 6. 45.5 2.4E-01 O151100900023 7. 99.0 0.61 O151100900024 8. 192.6 1.5 O151100900025 9. 303.0 3.0 O151100900026 10. 353.2 5.4 O151100900027 11. 308.7 7.8 O151100900028 12. 229.5 9.9 O151100900029 13. 166.9 11.6 O151100900030 14. 127.7 12.9 O151100900031 15. 103.8 13.9 O151100900032 16. 87.9 14.8 O151100900033 17. 76.2 15.7 O151100900034 18. 66.9 16.4 O151100900035 19. 59.1 17.1 O151100900036 20. 52.4 17.8 O151100900037 ENDDATA 21 0 O151100900038 ENDSUBENT 37 0 O151100999999 ENDENTRY 9 0 O151199999999