ENTRY A0401 20160212 A084A040100000001 SUBENT A0401001 20160212 A084A040100100001 BIB 12 29 A040100100002 TITLE (alpha,gamma) reaction on Au-197 A040100100003 AUTHOR (O.A.Capurro,M.de la Vega Vedoya,S.J.Nassiff) A040100100004 REFERENCE (J,JRN/L,128,403,1988) A040100100005 INSTITUTE (3ARGCNE) A040100100006 FACILITY (ISOCY,2GERKFK) A040100100007 METHOD (STTA,INTB) A040100100008 DETECTOR (GE-IN) The energy resolution was typically 2.1 keV A040100100009 FWHM at 122 keV. The absolute efficiency of the A040100100010 detector was determined with calibrated gamma-ray A040100100011 standard sources /57Co, 60Co, 22Na, 54Mn, 106Ru, 133Ba,A040100100012 137Cs and 152Eu/ A040100100013 MONITOR (29-CU-65(A,X)31-GA-67,,SIG) A040100100014 (29-CU-63(A,X)30-ZN-65,,SIG) A040100100015 MONIT-REF (P0058002,F.S.Houck+,J,PR,123,231,1961) A040100100016 (B0154004,E.Lebowitz+,J,ARI,21,625,1970) A040100100017 (B0079017,E.A.Bryant+,J,PR,130,1512,1963) A040100100018 (P0070006,P.H.Stelson+,J,PR,133,B911,1964) A040100100019 (B0040018,H.P.Graf+,J,JIN,36,3647,1974) A040100100020 (B0058006,M.Hille+,J,NP/A,198,625,1972) A040100100021 (R0039002,K.G.Porges,J,PR,101,225,1956) A040100100022 (B0156005,N.T.Porile+,J,PR,116,1193,1959) A040100100023 ANALYSIS (DECAY) A040100100024 STATUS (TABLE) Tbl.1 of JRN/L,128,403,1988 A040100100025 HISTORY (19890320C) A040100100026 (20160212A) SD:Updated to new date formats,lower case. A040100100027 REL-REF added to Subent 002. Author's name corrected A040100100028 (Capuro -> Capurro). BIB update. SF1=Cu-0 -> Cu-65 inA040100100029 MONITOR (1), SF1=Cu-0 -> Cu-63 in MONITOR (2) code. A040100100030 ANALYSIS (AREA) deleted (not relevant). A040100100031 ENDBIB 29 0 A040100100032 NOCOMMON 0 0 A040100100033 ENDSUBENT 32 0 A040100199999 SUBENT A0401002 20160212 A084A040100200001 BIB 6 24 A040100200002 REACTION (79-AU-197(A,G)81-TL-201,,SIG) A040100200003 DECAY-DATA (81-TL-201,73.1HR,DG,165.9,, A040100200004 DG,167.4) A040100200005 REL-REF (C,A0222002,C.Necheva+,J,ARI,48,807,1997) A040100200006 ERR-ANALYS (EN-ERR) The energy uncertainty A040100200007 (DATA-ERR) The uncertainties were estimated by A040100200008 propagating in quadrature: A040100200009 * the contributions from the decay curve, A040100200010 * the peak analysis, A040100200011 * the absolute detector efficiency, A040100200012 * the disintegration scheme, A040100200013 * the target thickness and A040100200014 * the alpha-particle flux. A040100200015 Generally, the error is estimated to be 17-22%, exceptA040100200016 for the values corresponding to the minimum and maximumA040100200017 energies whose error increased to 50% due to the very A040100200018 low counting rate. A040100200019 SAMPLE The stack consisted of gold foils and copper foils A040100200020 interleaved between the first as degraders of the A040100200021 beam.All the target foils of the stack were generally A040100200022 thick enough to make the loss of recoil atoms A040100200023 negligible,the thickness of each foil (Au and Cu) A040100200024 ranged from 17 mg/cm**2 to 25 mg/cm**2. A040100200025 HISTORY (20160212A) SD: REL-REF added. ERR-T -> DATA-ERR. A040100200026 ENDBIB 24 0 A040100200027 COMMON 1 3 A040100200028 EN-ERR A040100200029 MEV A040100200030 0.5 A040100200031 ENDCOMMON 3 0 A040100200032 DATA 3 7 A040100200033 EN DATA DATA-ERR A040100200034 MEV MB MB A040100200035 39.7 0.64 0.50 A040100200036 35.3 1.71 0.37 A040100200037 30.4 3.93 0.69 A040100200038 24.8 5.06 0.88 A040100200039 22.2 4.17 0.71 A040100200040 14.6 1.15 0.23 A040100200041 11.0 0.12 0.07 A040100200042 ENDDATA 9 0 A040100200043 ENDSUBENT 42 0 A040100299999 ENDENTRY 2 0 A040199999999